BCLTC reacts to the increased softwood lumber trade

 Wednesday, August 13, 2025

BCLTC has published a report that reads that the U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized its decision to more than double the countervailing duties on Canadian softwood lumber imports, increasing the rate from 6.74% to 14.63%. Combined with the recently raised anti-dumping duty of 20.56%, the total duty level now stands at 35.19%. This significant hike has elicited strong reactions from the British Columbia (BC) Lumber Trade Council (BCLTC) and other stakeholders in the Canadian forestry industry.

Kurt Niquidet, President of the BCLTC, expressed deep concern over the U.S. decision, stating, “This decision will harm communities on both sides of the border.” He emphasized that the increased duties place unnecessary strain on forestry-dependent regions in Canada while driving up construction costs for American builders and families. Niquidet called for a stable, negotiated agreement that supports jobs, trade, and housing affordability. He further added, “What is needed now is a stable, negotiated agreement that supports jobs, trade, and housing affordability.”

The BCLTC is urging both the Government of Canada and the U.S. Administration to prioritize resolving the longstanding softwood lumber dispute. Niquidet advocates for meaningful negotiations over litigation, stating, “We believe the best way forward is through meaningful negotiation—not litigation.” He highlighted that a durable agreement would bring certainty to a critical cross-border supply chain and support the long-term interests of both countries.

Government response

In response to the increased duties, the Government of Canada has expressed its disappointment, labeling the U.S. actions as unwarranted and unjust. Trade Minister Mary Ng emphasized that these duties harm Canadian industry and increase housing costs in both countries. Canada has indicated its intention to challenge the U.S. decision through all available legal channels, including proceedings under the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA).

Economic implications

The imposition of higher duties is expected to have several economic repercussions:

1. Increased construction costs: American builders and consumers may face higher prices for homes and renovations due to the increased cost of imported Canadian lumber.
2. Market disruption: The elevated duties could disrupt the supply chain, affecting the availability and pricing of softwood lumber in the U.S. market.
3. Job impacts: Forestry-dependent communities in Canada, particularly in British Columbia, may experience job losses and economic downturns as a result of reduced demand for Canadian lumber.

The BCLTC is advocating for a negotiated settlement to address the softwood lumber dispute. Niquidet stresses the importance of a stable, rules-based trading relationship between Canada and the United States. He asserts that a durable agreement would benefit both countries by ensuring a reliable supply of softwood lumber and maintaining economic stability in affected regions.

The recent decision by the U.S. to significantly increase tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber imports has intensified the ongoing trade dispute between the two nations. While the U.S. justifies the duties as necessary to protect its domestic industry, stakeholders in Canada, particularly in British Columbia, view them as detrimental to their economy and communities. As both governments explore avenues for resolution, the outcome of this dispute will have lasting implications for the forestry industry, trade relations, and housing markets in North America.

About BCLTC

The majority of timber producers in British Columbia are represented on trade issues by the BC Timber Trade Council (BCLTC). Approximately 40% of Canada’s softwood exports to the US and one-third of its softwood lumber production come from British Columbia.

Where does BCLTC stand?

• For Canadian forest product workers, businesses, and communities to have access to markets and stability, the BCLTC firmly supports the government of Canada’s efforts to reach another managed trade agreement with the United States. Thanks to the federal and provincial governments for prioritizing this, BCLTC.
• They still think a new deal may give lumber producers in the U.S. and Canada stability and certainty if it is well-crafted.
• They fervently hope that the U.S. industry will put a stop to this decades-long legal battle and instead collaborate with us to secure the low-carbon wood products that the world, including American families, desires.
• Nevertheless, as they have done effectively in the past, they will continue to work with the Canadian government to actively protect the industry against these trade proceedings filed by the U.S. lumber lobby in the absence of an agreement.

For more updates, visit the European woodworking industry website: woodandpanel.com

Tags: BC Lumber Trade Council, Canadian softwood lumber, construction costs, forestry industry, trade relations, U.S. tariffs